Add an authentication control
Provide supported transaction context to the issuer-side assessment and authenticate the cardholder when required.
Risk Service
Coordinate supported EMV 3-D Secure authentication for card-not-present journeys, from requestor-side integration to eligible issuer-side ACS deployments.
For merchants, PSPs, acquirers, platforms, issuers and card programs defining online cardholder authentication roles.
Service outcomes
These are operating goals, not performance guarantees. Results depend on scope, participants, implementation and customer operations.
Provide supported transaction context to the issuer-side assessment and authenticate the cardholder when required.
Plan frictionless and challenge paths around the channel, device, timeout, cancellation and return experience.
Use supported 3D Secure flows as one part of scheme, SCA, risk and regional compliance planning without assuming compliance.
Coverage & fit
Versions, schemes, processors, SDK responsibility, challenge methods, regions, exemptions and certification scope are specific to the deployment.
Supported merchant, PSP, acquirer or platform authentication requests and result handling.
Eligible issuer or card-program evaluation and challenge coordination included only where contracted.
Supported browser or mobile-app journeys with explicitly allocated SDK, redirect and return responsibilities.
Return protocol status and applicable authentication data to a separately managed authorization flow.
A successful authentication does not approve a payment. The relevant issuer makes a separate authorization decision if processing continues.
Priority use cases
Coordinate supported authentication context and challenge return paths around checkout.
Plan authentication for compatible booking, cross-border and higher-value card-not-present journeys.
Define authentication around the initial customer-initiated setup and the later payment model.
Evaluate eligible ACS responsibilities alongside issuer policy and cardholder operations.
Core capabilities
A customer receives only the roles, components, versions, channels and methods expressly confirmed in its deployment.
Collect and exchange supported account, device, channel, merchant and transaction context.
Return an issuer-side authentication result without cardholder interaction when the ACS assessment permits it.
Coordinate supported challenge presentation, cardholder action, timeout, cancellation and return handling.
Evaluate requests under issuer policy and select the supported authentication path for eligible deployments.
Map protocol status, applicable authentication values, callbacks, errors and downstream references.
Define records, monitoring, exception handling and support escalation across the participating systems.
Integration & deployment
Technical design identifies the supplied component, protocol role, credentials, certificates, channel behavior, events and authorization handoff.
Request technical documentation →Evaluate a standalone path or connect with Vellfi Orchestration and Gateway where separately supported.
Define collection, redirects or embedded challenge, timeout, accessibility and return behavior.
Allocate any SDK, deep-link, challenge and app-to-backend responsibilities only where supported.
Exercise frictionless, challenge, failure, cancellation, timeout and authorization handoff paths before rollout.
How it works
The issuer-side ACS determines the authentication path; downstream payment authorization remains separate.
Collect context. Assemble the supported account, device, channel, merchant and transaction data.
Send request. Exchange the authentication request through the supported 3D Secure participants.
Evaluate risk. The issuer-side ACS applies issuer policy and available context.
Authenticate. Complete frictionlessly or move to a supported cardholder challenge.
Return status. Return protocol outcome and applicable authentication data to the payment flow.
Request authorization. If processing continues, submit a separate authorization request to the relevant participant.
Illustrative scenario—not a customer case study
Browser and app bookings include different participants, return paths and operational handling for failed or abandoned authentication.
ChallengeThe team needs one explicit model for request context, issuer-side outcomes, customer experience and authorization handoff.
Vellfi scopes the supported requestor integration, flow events and, where eligible, issuer-side ACS responsibilities with the payment participants.
Potential operating effectThe platform has defined authentication and exception paths. Fraud, approval, liability and SCA outcomes still depend on scheme rules, implementation and participant behavior.
Responsibilities & availability
Provides lawful request data, checkout and challenge experience, and agreed result handling.
Exchange supported protocol messages and return the authentication result.
Applies issuer policy, selects the path and returns the protocol outcome.
Handle the separate gateway, acquiring, processing and authorization flow.
Liability treatment and SCA depend on scheme rules, transaction and exemption type, protocol result, processing data, geography and participant compliance.
Next step
Share the participant roles, checkout channels, payment stack and authentication requirements without sending card data or live transaction records.
FAQ
It is a protocol family that lets payment participants exchange transaction context so an issuer can assess and, when needed, authenticate a cardholder.
An Access Control Server is the issuer-side component that evaluates authentication requests, selects a frictionless or challenge path and returns the result.
No. Authentication and authorization are separate decisions.
No. The issuer-side assessment determines the path. Vellfi does not promise that a transaction will be frictionless or challenged.
No. Liability depends on scheme rules, result, transaction type, exemption, processing data, geography and participant compliance.
No. It can support an SCA design, but compliance depends on the full implementation and participant responsibilities.
The initial customer-initiated setup and later merchant-initiated transactions can have different authentication and liability treatment.
Compatibility is deployment-specific and must be confirmed during technical scoping.