Create one case record
Connect transaction data, dispute reasons, participant references, deadlines and returned status in one case record.
Risk Service
Coordinate supported dispute cases, deadlines, evidence and returned statuses across the teams and participants responsible for them.
For PSPs, issuers, fintechs, merchants and platforms that need clearer post-transaction dispute operations.
Service outcomes
These are operating goals, not performance guarantees. Results depend on scope, participants, implementation and customer operations.
Connect transaction data, dispute reasons, participant references, deadlines and returned status in one case record.
Use reason- and workflow-specific evidence requirements to request material from the responsible source.
Feed approved reason and outcome patterns back to merchant, payment, authentication or customer-service review.
Coverage & fit
Networks, reason codes, processors, evidence formats, deadlines, representment rights and case stages vary by transaction and participant.
Supported card-payment or provider dispute cases received from contracted participants.
Eligible issuer-side case and cardholder-service workflows included in the operating model.
Booking, cancellation, refund, no-show or delivery evidence where relevant to the case.
Approved case trends returned to onboarding, screening, authentication or payment teams.
Evidence coordination cannot guarantee representment eligibility, liability allocation, recovery, win rate or acceptance by an acquirer, issuer or network.
Priority use cases
Coordinate transaction, customer, fulfilment and policy evidence against the applicable case deadline.
Relate platform, seller, customer and payment records to the responsible case and decision path.
Organize reservation, disclosure, service, cancellation and refund records for supported disputes.
Support eligible issuer or card-program case handling alongside cardholder and authentication records.
Core capabilities
The applicable participant rules, reason codes, deadlines, evidence and response actions are confirmed for the deployment.
Receive supported dispute notices, transaction references, reason information and deadlines.
Map provider or network detail to the agreed operating categories while retaining source data.
Make the applicable response milestone and responsible owner visible to operations.
Request reason- and case-specific records from the approved merchant, platform or service source.
Prepare and route supported response actions to the participant responsible for submission.
Record status, outcome and approved feedback for operations and risk review.
Integration & deployment
Design covers case source, transaction identifiers, event delivery, deadlines, evidence access, response ownership and outcome updates.
Request technical documentation →Receive supported dispute events from contracted processors, acquirers, issuers or other sources.
Relate the case to gateway, orchestration, authentication and customer references where available.
Request approved records from fulfilment, booking, merchant, customer-service or policy systems.
Route tasks, deadlines, escalation and outcome status to the responsible team.
How it works
The responsible participant decides whether and how to respond under the applicable rules.
Receive. Accept the supported case, reason, references and deadline.
Classify. Map the case to the agreed type and responsible owner.
Collect. Request the applicable evidence and identify missing material.
Respond. Route the supported action to the participant authorized to submit it.
Record and learn. Capture the outcome and return approved insights to operations and risk teams.
Illustrative scenario—not a customer case study
Payment, reservation and customer-service records are held in different systems and use different case references.
ChallengeThe dispute team spends time locating evidence while deadlines and ownership remain difficult to track.
Vellfi scopes supported case intake, transaction linkage, reason-specific evidence tasks, deadlines and outcome events across the responsible teams.
Potential operating effectThe platform receives defined case ownership and evidence handoffs. Recovery, liability and win-rate outcomes are not guaranteed.
Responsibilities & availability
Owns accurate records, disclosures, fulfilment evidence, policy and approved response decisions.
Provides only the supported case workflow, references, tasks and status included in scope.
Applies the relevant dispute rules, deadlines, evidence criteria, liability and case decision.
Supply approved customer, booking, delivery, refund, authentication or merchant-review records.
A dispute workflow must follow the applicable participant rules and current deadlines. Website content is not legal advice or a representment guarantee.
Next step
Share the case sources, transaction references, reason categories and operating handoffs without sending live case files through the public website.
FAQ
It covers supported case intake, classification, deadline visibility, evidence coordination, response handoff and outcome records.
No. The applicable participant decides the case under its rules and available evidence.
The participant authorized under the customer’s processor, acquirer, issuer or network arrangement retains that responsibility unless expressly agreed otherwise.
Potentially, where the transaction, gateway, orchestration, authentication and participant identifiers are available and supported.
The workflow records supported deadlines and tasks, but the customer and responsible participant must still meet the applicable rule and submission timing.
Yes, approved patterns can be returned to screening, onboarding, payment, authentication or customer-service review without treating correlation as proof.
Case sources, participants, reason codes, volumes, deadlines, evidence systems, response owners and outcome events are useful inputs.